Why Exxon’s ‘net zero’ pledge is meaningless

Six months after the activist hedge fund Engine No. 1 helped get three new members voted onto ExxonMobil’s board—with the aim to assist the corporate give attention to the existential dangers of fossil fuels—the oil firm has introduced an “ambition” to succeed in internet zero emissions by 2050. However should you simply noticed the headline, you’ll miss the high quality print. The dedication is to succeed in internet zero “in its operations.” However virtually the entire emissions that the corporate is liable for come from burning its merchandise. These emissions aren’t included.

Corporations with internet zero targets—which means that they’ll scale back emissions, after which offset the emissions that stay—range wildly of their ambition. Within the case of ExxonMobil, one in all a comparatively small group of firms responsible for the majority of greenhouse gas emissions on the planet, it’s exhausting to argue that the aim is credible. CEO Darren Woods says that the corporate is “dedicated to enjoying a number one function within the vitality transition.” However its internet zero aim is disconnected from the truth of local weather science, which means that all the world might want to attain internet zero emissions by 2050 on the newest; by some calculations, nations might collectively emit a lot by the top of this decade that we received’t be capable to preserve world warming beneath the 1.5-degree Celsius restrict to keep away from a few of the worst local weather impacts. In 2050, ExxonMobil plans to nonetheless be promoting oil and gasoline.

The corporate restricted its aim to “Scope 1” and “Scope 2” emissions, those who come straight from its personal operations and the vitality used to energy these operations. However round 85% of its complete emissions come from clients utilizing its gas. These so-called Scope 3 emissions, which embrace the air pollution from up and down the provision chain, are normally the most important supply of emissions for any firm, and any aim that avoids them is weak, say local weather scientists. Nevertheless it’s particularly an issue for an oil firm like ExxonMobil, which says that it emitted round 762 million metric tons of CO2 in 2020, 650 million tons of which had been Scope 3 emissions.


In its “advancing climate solutions” progress report, ExxonMobil argues that the world nonetheless is dependent upon fossil fuels—which is clearly true—and that if it lowered manufacturing, clients would purchase oil from different producers who won’t be utilizing strategies which might be sustainable. The corporate is right that bigger systemic adjustments have to occur to wean the world off oil, however its plan doesn’t embrace any assist for that transition.

Another fossil gas firms have internet zero pledges that do account for Scope 3 emissions. “BP and Shell are way more keen to speak about Scope 3 emissions from burning their merchandise, which is a key ingredient of being extra credible in speaking about internet zero,” says Kathy Mulvey, the accountability marketing campaign director for the nonprofit Union of Involved Scientists. “However there are nonetheless actually necessary gaps there.” One problem is the truth that many firms plan to offset their emissions in methods that could be not possible: Shell, for instance, would need to plant an area of trees roughly the size of Italy by 2050 to offset its emissions. Occidental Petroleum plans to suck carbon out of the air to offset its Scope 3 emissions, and although that know-how exists, it hasn’t but been confirmed at a big scale.

Different firms are going additional: Orsted, a Danish vitality firm that used to supply oil and gasoline, is phasing out fossil fuels totally and changing into a renewable vitality utility (and dealing to scale back Scope 3 emissions intimately, together with within the metal used to make its wind generators). That fundamental shift is mandatory, Mulvey says. “Even the Worldwide Vitality Company is saying that we want a pointy, speedy flip away from fossil fuels to restrict local weather change,” she says. “So our vitality system of the long run can’t be fossil dependent.”

At ExxonMobil, buyers are prone to preserve pushing exhausting for the corporate to take the subsequent step to contemplate Scope 3 emissions, and the corporate is prone to proceed to withstand. “Buyers have been speaking for some time with ExxonMobil a couple of ‘Kodak second’ —firms that get left behind in main technological and societal transformation,” she says. “What ExxonMobil has finished very well for a lot of many years is to seek out and dig up oil and gasoline. So I don’t know that the company management and the company tradition is in place to reply to that demand, and I’m certain that that’s a giant a part of what the brand new administrators are looking for to perform inside the corporate.”