Senate hearing reveals why we can’t fix gun violence

p 1 infuriating senate hearing on gun violence reveals precisely why we canand8217t gun violence

All anybody want learn about Tuesday morning’s Senate hearing on gun violence is that it was already on the docket earlier than a mass capturing on Monday at a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado, left ten lifeless, together with the primary responding officer.

This capturing arrived lower than every week after a person shot and killed eight folks, together with six ladies of Asian descent, throughout three spas in Atlanta, Georgia.

Lots of people on-line have been making darkish jokes about worry of the pandemic subsiding as an increasing number of individuals are getting vaccinated, solely to get replaced by the outdated, acquainted worry of mass shootings. However the fact of the matter is that 2020 was nonetheless one of America’s deadliest years for gun violence in decades. The pandemic merely took ‘large-scale’ mass shootings off the desk.

Advertisements

It’s an unacceptable state of affairs that the nation’s residents don’t have any selection however to just accept.

As for the nation’s governing physique, its members have the facility to take preventative motion towards additional mass shootings, however all too usually they as a substitute decide on a technique of ideas and prayers.

“We’re Senate leaders. What are we doing?” requested Democratic Senator Dick Durbin on the prime of Tuesday’s hearing on gun violence. “What are we doing apart from reflecting and praying?”

A number of the options Democratic senators like Durbin, Richard Blumenthal, and Dianne Feinstein help such gun-control measures as common background checks and a ban on assault weapons. These measures take pleasure in broad help from Individuals, with polls pointing towards 90% for background checks and two-thirds in favor of the assault weapons ban. These senators spend their time in hearings equivalent to this one making commonsense circumstances for these well-liked initiatives, and alluring their colleagues throughout the aisle to hitch them.

Nevertheless, the problem of gun possession way back turned a partisan place in American politics, and Republicans as a unit have been unwavering of their perception that no quantity of bloodshed is value doubtlessly making it tougher for lawful residents to acquire weapons.

One after one other, Republican senators in Tuesday’s hearings paid lip service to the devastation of mass shootings, earlier than suggesting that the plain answer to the issue is making it simpler to weed out potential mass shooters and get them off the road. Maybe the “precogs” from Minority Report will dream of mass shootings earlier than they occur and save us!

Republican Senator Ted Cruz may very well be a type of precogs, it appears, contemplating his skill to see the longer term as described in a speech in the course of the hearing.

Advertisements

“Each time there’s a capturing the place we play this ridiculous theater the place this committee will get collectively and proposes a bunch of legal guidelines that might do nothing to cease these murders,” Cruz says, declaring with whole confidence and nil proof how gun management measures would fail.

One would possibly assume that Cruz, who rode into politics with the Tea Get together and lately flew out to Cancun throughout a disaster within the state he represents, would possibly signify solely the extra excessive place of the social gathering. However his staunch, aggrieved opposition to gun management is the favored place amongst Senate Republicans, which turned obvious as an increasing number of spoke—usually with clunky metaphors. Among the many extra awkward ones used to explain the folly of gun management, Sen. John Kennedy could have had the worst, together with one which instantly contradicts Cruz’s place. Kennedy defined that the high incident rate of drunk driving doesn’t mean taking away all cars. Nevertheless, that metaphor additional solely goes to point out the impossibility of locking up drunk drivers earlier than they trigger accidents. To not point out every part else mistaken with it.

To assist make their case, Democrats included testimony from folks like Robin Brule, who misplaced her mom to a mass shooter who bought his gun on-line.

“If a retirement group at 8 a.m. is the mistaken place on the mistaken time, the place is the correct place in America?” Brule requested.

To assist make their case, Republicans included testimony from Chris Cheng, a sport shooter who gained Season 4 of the Historical past Channel’s High Shot, to argue that gun management is racist.

These two sides have been at loggerheads on this concern for a very long time. It couldn’t be extra clear which aspect is severe about lowering the variety of deaths by gun violence in America, and which aspect feels burdened by having to defend their resistance to making an attempt something the opposite aspect suggests, regardless of what number of Individuals help it.

What’s not clear but is whether or not any of this gridlock might probably change in any respect below the brand new administration.