Jack Dorsey’s Block sued by H&R Block after Square rebrand

H&R Block, the tax-preparation firm, has filed a lawsuit towards Block, the e-payment firm previously referred to as Square, for alleged trademark infringement. In a press release Thursday, it argued that the rebranding by Jack Dorsey’s fintech big is a “shortcut to capitalize on the well-known Block moniker” in addition to a “clear violation” of the tax firm’s trademark rights.

“At the moment’s submitting,” CEO Jeff Jones defined within the launch, “is a crucial effort to forestall client confusion and guarantee a competitor can not leverage the repute and belief now we have constructed over greater than six many years.”

H&R Block says the entire Square-is-now-Block rebrand may confuse its clients, and this argument is likely to be more true than you’d suppose: Dorsey’s Block has been increasing into fintech for a while past Square’s unique product, cell credit-card readers. It purchased Afterpay this summer season, but in addition nabbed Credit score Karma’s tax-preparation unit, which it folded into Money App and renamed Money App Taxes. At this juncture, Block and H&R Block grew to become direct opponents, the tax firm argues. In its grievance, which it shared with Quick Firm, the corporate additionally claims that Money App’s emblem (a inexperienced sq. with a white greenback signal) is simply too just like the one it’s identified for (a inexperienced sq. with the phrases “H&R Block” in white).


H&R Block argues there have already been “quite a few indications” that individuals are complicated the 2 firms, although it didn’t present particular examples when Quick Firm requested.

On the one hand, its declare can would possibly spark some eye-rolling. The press launch and lawsuit repeatedly discuss with the corporate as merely “Block,” as if it’s regular to say, “I’m stopping by my native Block to get my taxes completed as we speak.” A fast look at H&R Block’s past few months of press releases doesn’t reveal any occasion the place the corporate calls itself simply “Block.”

Nonetheless, the corporate does make a robust case that it’s spent years—and lots of of tens of millions of {dollars}—on branding that depends on that shorthand. It has a cell app known as MyBlock, tax-preparation software program known as Blockworks, and its small-business-adviser unit Block Advisors makes use of the tagline “Block Has Your Again,” amongst different examples.

Square’s Block didn’t instantly reply to Quick Firm‘s request for remark in regards to the lawsuit.

As a model, after all, the brand new Block is far fuzzier, in the identical method Fb’s lately introduced Meta and Google’s Alphabet have virtually no branding past being the dad and mom of their extra well-known kids. In that context, Block’s identify change may very well be seen as one other indication of what critics see as Huge Tech’s behavior of making use of its winners-take-all mentality to not simply trademarked names, however simply plain generic, on a regular basis phrases.

When Fb grew to become Meta earlier this yr, an Arizona-based startup known as Meta filed a lawsuit. When Google grew to become Alphabet again in 2015, BMW said wait a minute, as a result of it already owned that trademark. The identify was additionally getting used by California’s Alphabet Power, New York’s Alphabet hedge fund, and Alphabet Images, whose proprietor on the time simply shrugged and said, “Who sues Google?” None of it stopped Google from utilizing the Alphabet identify, after all.

However Huge Tech’s regular place is that these are widespread phrases, so anybody is welcome to make use of them—except the get together doing the name-grabbing is any person grabbing theirs: For instance, 5 days after Fb modified its identify to Meta, an Australian artist named Thea-Mai Baumann who was unfortunate sufficient to be posting her skilled work beneath the Instagram deal with “Metaverse” had her account suddenly disabled. Although she’s since made a public fuss and Meta seems to have reactivated the account, she says somebody initially warned her, “FB isn’t gonna purchase it, they’re gonna take it.”