AMC, GME theories shot down by SEC

p 1 SEC shoots down conspiracy theories for what caused GameStops stock mania

The Securities and Change Fee has released a hotly anticipated report on January’s buying and selling frenzy that rocketed so-called meme shares into the stratosphere. It dismisses conspiracy theories that swept social media to ostensibly clarify the weird buying and selling exercise, selecting essentially the most anodyne rationalization as an alternative: that what fueled the GameStop rally was nothing greater than tons of of 1000’s of recent traders—at one level, reaching practically 1 million per day—coming into right into a sudden feeding frenzy over these shares.

“Whether or not pushed by a want to squeeze quick sellers and thus to revenue from the resultant rise in value, or by perception within the fundamentals of GameStop,” the SEC writes, “it was the optimistic sentiment, not the buying-to-cover, that sustained the weeks-long value appreciation of GameStop inventory.”

Its 44-page report additionally throws a moist blanket on the speculation {that a} “quick squeeze” is what despatched GameStop shares sky-high—from beneath $20 in December to $483 by the tip of January. Whereas the company admits it’s true that many quick sellers had been pressured to cowl their quick positions, it argues that the proof simply doesn’t assist this being the driving issue. It says merchants masking their quick positions accounted for less than a “small fraction of general purchase quantity,” and GameStop’s inventory costs stayed elevated even after the results of their masking ought to’ve waned.


As for different blame, the regulator does take a swing at cellular brokerage apps like Robinhood. It insinuates they’re recklessly gamifying buying and selling: “Consideration needs to be given as to whether gamelike options and celebratory animations … meant to create optimistic suggestions from buying and selling lead traders to commerce greater than they’d in any other case.”

But it surely stops in need of saying what to do about them. Observers had eagerly awaited the report as a result of (they’d hoped) it might advocate particular coverage adjustments that the SEC believes needs to be made within the debacle’s wake. The company leaves these and different questions unanswered, and likewise doesn’t deal with the position that armchair merchants on Reddit performed, or whether or not anyone made massive sums of cash by whipping up optimistic sentiment on-line to govern the market.